top of page
  • Dr. David Neiman

Genesis, Chapter 5 – Babylonian King List

The Babylonian King List substantiates the ideas we find in the Sumerian King List. It also seems to be the antecedent of the list in Genesis chapter 5. We do not have the Babylonian King List in its original form; no cuneiform tablets have been discovered which compare with the Sumerian. But we do have fragments of the writings of Berossus, a Babylonian scholar who wrote his history of Babylonia in Greek in the third century B.C.E. While we do not have his original text, there are fragments quoted by later historians which reflect an authentic ancient tradition from which we can gather enough information to understand the ideas of the Babylonians which relate to the fifth chapter of Genesis.

According to the fragments of Berossus preserved in Eusebius' Chronicle, 16 whose contents have been confirmed by discoveries in Babylonian Cuneiform tablets, the following is the list of the ante-diluvian kings of Babylon and their parallels or equivalents in the Sumerian King List and in the list of Genesis 5.

Berossus Babylonian Sumerian Genesis 5

Cuneiform King List

Aloros Aruru Alulim Adam

Alaparos Adapa Alalgar Seth

Awelu Awelu En-men-luanna Enosh

Ammenon Ummanu En-men-Galanna Kenan

Megalaros Dumuzi Mahalal-El

Daonos En-sipa-zianna Jared

Evendorachos En-men-duranki En-men-duranna Hanokh

Amempsinos Amel-Sin Ubar-Tutu Metushelah

Apartes Ubar-Tutu Lamech

Ksisouthros Ut-Napishtim Atrahasis Noah

(Ziusudra)

In the story of the Flood, the surviving hero in Sumerian texts is either Atrahasis or Ziusudra. In the Babylonian Epic of Gilagmesh, it is Ut-Napishtim.17 But the tenth name in the list of Berossus seems to reflect either the name of Sumerian Ziusudra or Atrahasis or a fusion of both names. If Atra-hasis was read as Hasis-atra,18 then the Greek transliteration would surely have been a fusion of the two Sumerian names of the survivor of the Flood. [Hasis-Atra=Ksisouthros] In the biblical account it is Noah.

It should be apparent that there is a clear realtionship between the Babylonian King List as transmitted from Berossus, and the list of the patriarchs in Genesis 5. But there are differences, and these are significant, since the account in Genesis reflects a view of anthropology, of human origins which differs from that of the dominant view that we find in the Pagan world. It is, as is the account of human origins found in Genesis 2 and 3 a rejection of the views on human origins that we find in all of the religious expressions of the peoples of the ancient Near East other than the People of Israel.

43 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

The Hidden Treasures of the Judean Desert

The top find of 2023 according to National Geographic are four Roman-era swords discovered in a cave near the Dead Sea in Israel. Ariel University’s Asaf Gayer and geologist Boaz Langford entered the

History of the Sadducees Part 16

The pietists and their affiliated groups who ultimately came to be subsumed under the general term of Pharisees, continued the tradition of Torah interpretation which ultimately came to be known as th

History of the Sadducees Part 15

Who were the Pharisees? The Pharisees were the bearers of the ancient tradition of Torah interpretation which had been brought from Babylonia by Ezra the Scribe and his associates when they came to Je

bottom of page